Page 36 of 37

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2012 8:36 pm
by 600#gorilla

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 4:26 pm
by skav
People all worried their truck isn't truck enough. Must be rough.

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:35 pm
by 600#gorilla
there is this thing called snow.

it often is an obstacle, here, at high elevation.

i have never driven or owned an AWD automobile, but Audi and Subaru are the most popular

cars in SLC. everybody else drives a 4x4 truck.

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 2:54 pm
by Lox

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 5:18 pm
by toivo
on the traction thing, my honey drives an awd car with studded tires, and it's like a little tank. on icy or snow packed roads i feel safer in that than in the truck. but when there's slush or drifting snow the heavier vehicle with bigger tires is steadier. i know guys who have studded tires on their trucks too, but sooo expensive.

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 5:31 pm
by skav
600#gorilla wrote:there is this thing called snow.

it often is an obstacle, here, at high elevation.

i have never driven or owned an AWD automobile, but Audi and Subaru are the most popular

cars in SLC. everybody else drives a 4x4 truck.


7,000 vs. 4,000, tard. You can't even see as high as I be.

I was more bragging that I never have to worry if my rig is truck enough. Unless I'm going uphill or towing. Then it is decidedly SLUG.

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 10:10 pm
by 600#gorilla
Image

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:03 pm
by John Wayne
600#gorilla wrote:Image


making small look big still equals small

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:20 pm
by 600#gorilla
which is precisely why the car is so great.

perfect city car for anybody that has to haul outsize things.

gets great gas mileage, turns on a dime, fits in small parking spaces....

and for us - a perfect delivery van for our business.

advertising wrap coming next....

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 2:10 am
by Shaft
skav wrote:
7,000 vs. 4,000, tard. You can't even see as high as I be.

I was more bragging that I never have to worry if my rig is truck enough. Unless I'm going uphill or towing. Then it is decidedly SLUG.


Top o' LCC is around 8500 and I drive up there most months out of the year...

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 6:58 pm
by 600#gorilla
Shaft wrote:
skav wrote:
7,000 vs. 4,000, tard. You can't even see as high as I be.

I was more bragging that I never have to worry if my rig is truck enough. Unless I'm going uphill or towing. Then it is decidedly SLUG.


Top o' LCC is around 8500 and I drive up there most months out of the year...


yeah, us too! we like to ride at teh bird!

4x4 won out over AWD:

Image

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 8:05 pm
by skav
Nice. I've really liked the newer Fords I've driven lately. Go get it dirty.

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2012 9:44 pm
by Lox
Who leaves their christmas lights on in the day in the summer?

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:53 pm
by 600#gorilla
this merchant does:

http://www.theartfloral.com/

looks real good with the old-school neon sign.

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:47 am
by Lox
I see what you did there. Subtle.

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Fri Aug 24, 2012 8:01 pm
by 600#gorilla

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:55 pm
by 600#gorilla
a couple of unusual oldies on the road........

Datsun on Santa Monica Pier, Ca.

Image

Studebaker

Image

Tooele, Utah.

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:32 pm
by malachi
for STFU....


Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:32 am
by RockPharmer

Re: CARS FUCKING RULE

PostPosted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:42 pm
by stonefiend
E36's are the shit, if you like working on cars and don't mind a shit interior.