Shit Eaters part deux

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby wild beast » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:13 am

i see. you are one of those "angry" shit eaters. ah hell, all shit eaters are angry unless the federal government is spoon feeding them someone's free shit.
User avatar
wild beast
Diamond
 
Posts: 4351
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Mojave Desert

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Choppie » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:20 am

ANGRY!!??? FUCK YOU PISS DRINKER!!!!

I will fly out to your piss drenched town, rip your fat back off your spine and beat you to death with it!!! Then I will hike all your slab projects in snow shoes listening to hip hop!@!!
Choppie
Topaz
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2002 12:04 pm

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Lox » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:39 am

wild beast wrote:YOU VOTE A VERY VERY VERY LIBERAL PARTY LINE.


Again, you are completely wrong. And stupid for thinking so.

And Choppie makes a good point. The electoral college vote means more than teh individual vote. And WB... your electoral votes have gone blue the last few go-rounds, while I'm all red voting in AZ and TX.
User avatar
Lox
Diamond
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Fleazag4sheezag.

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby actionhero » Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:40 am

wild beast wrote:i vote for conservatives.


I don't doubt you vote Republican, but name one CONSERVATIVE you have voted for in a state or federal election.
User avatar
actionhero
Corundum
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 6:06 pm

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby wild beast » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:09 am

Choppie wrote:ANGRY!!??? FUCK YOU PISS DRINKER!!!!

I will fly out to your piss drenched town, rip your fat back off your spine and beat you to death with it!!! Then I will hike all your slab projects in snow shoes listening to hip hop!@!!


sorry. i meant angry cocksucking cum guzzling fag bitch shit eater pussy queer..

fly on out. your final destination is Inyokern airport (IYK). i'll pick you up.. and drop you off ;)

state election i vote libertarian mostly. there was a dude who was a stand-up conservative, but i've forgotten his name. that was over 10 years ago and he was going against none other you and your ilk's poster girl shit eating liberal Democrap... BARBARA BOXER. ugh.. you shit eaters vote Retardocrat.

ps, who is choppie, when did he (she?) join.. nice to see that there is yet another Loxcocksucker in the group.
User avatar
wild beast
Diamond
 
Posts: 4351
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Mojave Desert

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby wild beast » Thu Aug 27, 2009 1:11 am

actionhero wrote:
wild beast wrote:i vote for conservatives.


I don't doubt you vote Republican, but name one CONSERVATIVE you have voted for in a state or federal election.


you first!

oh that's right. you never come up with anything of your own. shucks.
User avatar
wild beast
Diamond
 
Posts: 4351
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Mojave Desert

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Choppie » Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:21 am

wild beast wrote:sorry. i meant angry cocksucking cum guzzling fag bitch shit eater pussy queer..

fly on out. your final destination is Inyokern airport (IYK). i'll pick you up.. and drop you off ;)

state election i vote libertarian mostly. there was a dude who was a stand-up conservative, but i've forgotten his name. that was over 10 years ago and he was going against none other you and your ilk's poster girl shit eating liberal Democrap... BARBARA BOXER. ugh.. you shit eaters vote Retardocrat.

ps, who is choppie, when did he (she?) join.. nice to see that there is yet another Loxcocksucker in the group.

I don't know Beast your response is both boring and predictable I am starting to think Pander banned you years ago and created a new version of Norman with your user name,

If that was the case it would be one of, if not the greatest troll in b.com history, but sadly I think you have just run out of material, you used to say some funny shit and now you just sound tired dude, but nobody can accuse you of not trying and just like all those low angled slabs you never were able to top out on, remember you did your best little buddy and tho the Liberals will get your guns and money eventually they can never take that away from you.
Choppie
Topaz
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2002 12:04 pm

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby wild beast » Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:35 am

^^ the picture perfect post of desperation.

choppie, if this is your coming out party, you are just like every other Loxcocksucker in a line so long and so SO tired. ugh. another loxcocksucker to deal with or just be done with?
User avatar
wild beast
Diamond
 
Posts: 4351
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Mojave Desert

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Choppie » Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:08 am

wild beast wrote:^^ the picture perfect post of desperation.

choppie, if this is your coming out party, you are just like every other Loxcocksucker in a line so long and so SO tired. ugh. another loxcocksucker to deal with or just be done with?

Sorry beast. you really are going nowhere with this and I have no affiliation with Lox, he has been a huge douchebag on this site many times over the years, but even he knew when it was time to shut the fuck up and move on and at least he can be entertaining.

You on the other hand have morphed into Cass mach 2. Yes sadly you are nothing now but a Fat Irish chick that doesn't climb but hangs out at a bouldering site so you can stalk a boulderer who lives in Arizona...I have no problem with your political views, but like everyone here (I would imagine) I kind of got your point 6000 posts ago. You used to have decent troll game and now your posts read like someone who crashed w/out a helmet. Time to move on man.....
Choppie
Topaz
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2002 12:04 pm

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby wild beast » Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:43 pm

"Choppie" is making rules now? this loudmouth tools comes on just like every single loxcocksucker before him, "slabs", "backfat".. and calls my troll played out? ha. typical shit eater hypocrite. cookie cutter patterned after his hero lox.

who the fuck are you? do you boulder? there's tons of people on here that don't boulder. and when i did they still wanted me gone. because they couldn't handle the truth about their shit eaters "Give it to me for free 'cuz I deserve it" shit eater attitude.

as far as my troll being over.. fucking please. i dropped in at that kindergarten "poopoo haiku" thread, taunted lox ONE time and he came running up with not ONE, not TWO, but THREE haikus. a thread he'da never posted in.

try again?
User avatar
wild beast
Diamond
 
Posts: 4351
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Mojave Desert

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby wild beast » Thu Aug 27, 2009 8:45 pm

that and my new avatar is ill
User avatar
wild beast
Diamond
 
Posts: 4351
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Mojave Desert

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby skav » Fri Aug 28, 2009 8:52 pm

Rubbing the electric lamp is not particularly rewarding. Anyway, nothing exciting happens.
User avatar
skav
Diamond
 
Posts: 2992
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2002 2:50 pm

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby wild beast » Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:29 am

is that some post katrina pic you painted of louisiana? where are all the black folk begging, raping, killing, beating, stealing, begging for money, getting shot by cops, murdering, stealing cars, whining, complaining, stealing, murdering, asking for money, bitching about the money they were given, etc., etc.?

if that is a post-Katrina pic, bad job.

i only mention it 'cuz people are still complaining about "Katrina". it's been said that George Bush caused Katrina... true?
User avatar
wild beast
Diamond
 
Posts: 4351
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Mojave Desert

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Choppie » Sat Aug 29, 2009 11:56 pm

wild beast wrote:"Choppie" is making rules now?


Great Idea!! Criz make me a moderator!
Choppie
Topaz
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2002 12:04 pm

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Ikefromla » Sun Aug 30, 2009 1:12 am

So my girlfriend, same one some of you have met, made me watch this show called "Hoarders." If you guys wanna see some shit eaters, watch that. Although some people on it seem to actually be sick, and therefore inspire sympathy.
User avatar
Ikefromla
Diamond
 
Posts: 1718
Joined: Sat Aug 23, 2003 1:55 am
Location: LA

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby pmahnn » Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:28 am

Oh beasty this will get your blood boiling!

http://www.thespectrum.com/article/2009 ... n+citizens

Mexico is outraged over influx of its own citizens

The shoe is on the other foot, and the Mexicans from Sonora don't like it one bit. Can you believe the nerve of these people? It's almost funny.

The state of Sonora is angry at the influx of Mexicans into Mexico. Nine state legislators from the state of Sonora traveled to Tucson to complain about Arizona's new employer crackdown on illegal immigrants from Mexico.Â

It seems that many illegal immigrants from Mexico are returning to their hometowns, and the officials in the Sonora state government are ticked off about it. A delegation of nine state legislators from Sonora was in Tucson recently to say Arizona's new employer sanctions law will have a devastating effect on the Mexican state. At a news conference the legislators said Sonora, Arizona's southern neighbor comprised mostly of small towns, cannot handle the demand for housing, jobs and schools it will face as Mexican workers here return to their country without jobs or money.

The Arizona law, which took effect Jan. 1, punishes employers who knowingly hire individuals who don't have valid legal documents to work in the United States. Penalties include suspension or loss of business licenses. Because more companies are complying, illegal immigrants are finding it more difficult to find work, so they are going home.

The Mexican legislators are angry because the influx of their own citizens is placing a burden on the state government.

"How can they pass a law like this?" asked Mexican representative Leticia Amparano-Gomez, who represents Nogales.

"There is not one person living in Sonora who doesn't have a friend or relative working in Arizona," she said, speaking in Spanish. "Mexico is not prepared for this, for the tremendous problems it will face as more and more people working in Arizona and sending money to their families, return to their hometowns without jobs."

"We are one family, socially and economically," she said of the people of Sonora and Arizona.

Wrong!

The United States is a sovereign nation, not a subsidiary of Mexico, and American taxpayers are not responsible for the welfare of Mexico's citizens. It's time for Mexico - and its citizens - to stop parasitically feeding off the United States and start taking care of its citizens' own needs.

I believe it's high time for all American states to pass a law like the one in Arizona. Perhaps that would solve many immigration problems that the U.S. Congress refuses to address.


To that end...here is an article on what the Danes have done to save their country from the invading parasitic Muslim population.

http://europenews.dk/en/node/6517

In Denmark, once-liberal immigration policies have forced huge governmental change and zero tolerance for Muslim immigrants intent on turning Denmark into an Islamic welfare haven. FSM Contributing Editor Susan MacAllen reveals a shocking reaction there and lessons America must learn.

In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark. An elderly woman to whom I was close said something to me one day that puzzled me for many years after. I forget what the context of our conversation was, but she commented that I - as a young American in Denmark - should not let any Dane scold me about the way America had treated its black population, because the Danes in her view treated their immigrants at least as badly. I wasn’t sure which immigrants she meant, so I asked her. She answered that she meant those from the Middle East.

But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn’t see these Muslim immigrants. The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism - one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time. The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism.

Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets - all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite?

By the 1990's the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious. Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark’s liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.

The New York Post in 2002 ran an article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted accurately that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported:

· "Muslim immigrants…constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending."

· "Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes."

· "Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane."

· "Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem..."

· "Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough - a not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim."

It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws. An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and the U.S.: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who as a teenager had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today.

In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. ( Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of "racism" by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.) If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark’s history, culture, and a Danish language test. You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship. You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won’t find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you. You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren’t.

In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government’s welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system as it existed was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. "We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration. The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now," he said.

A large thorn in the side of Denmark’s imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, "The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference," Hvilshøj says, "There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come." And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, "In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech."

Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family’s thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark. The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce.

Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law. And meanwhile, Americans clamor for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in America look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history . . . we would do well to look to Denmark, and say a prayer for her future and for our own.
User avatar
pmahnn
Diamond
 
Posts: 4660
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby wild beast » Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:51 am

that's what you and your ilk want. more shit eaters in this country. it is free votes. that is why you vote the "Shiteatercrat" ticket.

how do Shiteatercrats get votes? not from intelligent people. but from losers that have no education, don't work, don't shit, shit out kids, get in this country from some 4th world shithole and want more free shit.. then get the right to vote. THAT is YOUR ilk. THAT is your voting demographic.

let 'em all in. who cares. get rid of "America" and replace it with "Amryka". some perverted shit eater socialist idealist heinsous anus morphing of what should never be.

keep raising taxing and spending on worthless shit. retarded loser shiteater motherfuckers. keep that whole "I am alive, so the government owes me something" ideal up.
User avatar
wild beast
Diamond
 
Posts: 4351
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Mojave Desert

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby pmahnn » Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:56 am

I thought for sure you'd give props to Denmark for their actions instead rambling incoherent for a few sentences.
User avatar
pmahnn
Diamond
 
Posts: 4660
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby thulsadoom » Sat Sep 12, 2009 9:23 am

hey beast. Just curious, did you steal that thought fro Gustave Flaubert or is that your own work?
User avatar
thulsadoom
Corundum
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:55 pm
Location: Massachussetts

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Lox » Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:19 pm

pmahnn wrote:I thought for sure you'd give props to Denmark for their actions instead rambling incoherent for a few sentences.


DAB.
User avatar
Lox
Diamond
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Fleazag4sheezag.

PreviousNext

Return to Bouldering

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 180 guests